Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Loretta Leigh Canham

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 23, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell

DANIEL BRODERICK, Bar # 89424

Federal Defender DENNIS S. WAKS, Bar #142581 Supervising Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Defendant LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER]

Date: March 30, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, MICHAEL M. BECKWITH, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and DENNIS S. WAKS, Supervising Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant, LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM, that the current Status Conference date of March 23, 2012, be vacated and reset for March 30, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

This continuance is being requested because defense counsel requires additional time to review discovery, discuss the case with the government and pursue investigation.

It is further stipulated and agreed to between the parties that the time from the date of the signing of this order to and including March 30, 2012 should be excluded within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. All parties stipulate and agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)(Local Code T4).

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through March 30, 2012.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

20120323

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.