UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
March 27, 2012
IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge
MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (CA SBN 34097) MGoldman@mofo.com 2 STEPHEN P. FRECCERO (CA SBN 131093) SFreccero@mofo.com 3 DEREK F. FORAN (CA SBN 224569) DForan@mofo.com 4 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street 5 San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 6 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 7 Attorneys for Defendants EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION and EPSON 8 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. 9 10 11
This Document Relates to: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., C 09-5840 SI
MOTION ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR INJURIES IN FOREIGN MARKETS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]ORDER RE:BRIEFING SCHEDULE
2 defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei 3 Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc. and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. 5 and Tatung Company of America, Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics 6 Ltd., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung 8 Samsung SDI America, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation and 10 Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 12
WHEREAS Defendants will file a Joint Motion for Summary Judgment addressing Plaintiff's claims for injuries in foreign markets under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement 15
WHEREAS the Motion involves issues of fact and law that cannot be adequately 17 presented in 25 pages; 18 19 would be most efficient for the Court and the Parties; 20
The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. ("Motorola") and Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., 4 America, Inc., HannStar Display Corporation, LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., 7 Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and 9 Sharp Electronics Corporation, and Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., 11 ("Defendants"), parties to the above-entitled action, hereby stipulate as follows: 13 Act (the "Motion"); 16
WHEREAS Motorola and Defendants have agreed that an orderly schedule of the briefing
THEREFORE the Parties agree as follows:
1. Defendants shall submit the Motion by April 4, 2012. The page limit for the Memorandum in support of the Motion shall be 35 pages.
2. Motorola shall submit its Opposition to the Motion by May 18, 2012. The page limit for the Opposition shall be 45 pages.
3. Defendants shall submit a Reply by June 15, 2012. The page limit for the Reply shall be 30 pages.
4. The Motion shall be heard on July 13, 2012, or at such time as the Court may choose.
Attestation: I, Derek F. Foran, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 2 obtained from co-signatory Jason C. Murray. 3
Dated: March 27, 2012 By: /s/ Derek F. Foran 4 5 6 7
Pursuant to the Parties' stipulation set forth above,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.