Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The People v. Dennis Elliot Hendricks

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Placer)


March 27, 2012

THE PEOPLE, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,
v.
DENNIS ELLIOT HENDRICKS, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

(Super. Ct. No. 62103848A)

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hull , Acting P. J.

P. v. Hendricks

CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

On December 13, 2010, Auburn police found defendant Dennis Elliot Hendricks in possession of a useable amount of methamphetamine.

Defendant pleaded no contest to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)). The trial court sentenced defendant to a 16-month prison term to be served concurrently with a prison term in another case, imposed various fines and fees, and awarded 244 days' presentence credit (122 actual and 122 conduct).

Defendant appeals. He did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: BUTZ , J. MAURO , J.

20120327

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.