Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Federal Trade Commission v. Hope For Car Owners

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 28, 2012

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
HOPE FOR CAR OWNERS, LLC; AND PATRICK FREEMAN,
DEFENDANTS.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
NAFSO VLM, INC.; KORE SERVICES, LLC; NAYTHEM NAFSO; AND MICHAEL KAMFIROOZIE,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

RELATED CASE ORDER

Plaintiff filed a "Notice of Related Cases" on March 27, 2012, in which it states:

[T]he instant case is related to the following case, FTC v. NAFSO VLM, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:12-at-00393, that has also been filed in the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. The grounds for noticing these cases as related cases is as follows: both actions involve similar questions of fact and the same question of law and their assignment to the same Judge or Magistrate Judge is likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial effort, either because the same result should follow in both actions or otherwise.

(ECF No. 2.) However, examination of the above-entitled actions does not indicate that their "assignment . . . to a single Judge is likely to effect a savings of judicial effort or economies[.]" E.D. Cal. R. 123(c). While similar preliminary questions of law may exist, the actions involve different defendants and would involve different factual issues. Therefore, the undersigned judge declines to relate the actions.

20120328

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.