Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Paul Samuel Johnson v. Matthew Cate
March 28, 2012
PAUL SAMUEL JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MATTHEW CATE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.
On February 17, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Curt finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 17, 2012 (ECF No. 21), are ADOPTED in full; and
2. Defendants Cate, Hill, Viale, Stocker and Ohyenelce are DISMISSED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...