The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge
Plaintiff, a former prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.
On March 2, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 2, 2012 (ECF No. 78), are ADOPTED in full;
2. Defendants' motion to strike (ECF No. 63) is GRANTED;
3. Plaintiff's sur-reply filed on October 7, 2011 (ECF No. 62), is stricken;
4. Defendant Bemrick's motion to dismiss (ECF Nos. 29 & 67) is GRANTED;
5. The remaining defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 45) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;
6. Defendants Bemrick, Torruella, Cardeno, Lewis, and Lucas are DISMISSED; 7. Defendant Bemrick's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 70) is DENIED as moot; and
8. This action proceeds on the first amended complaint as against defendants Forsterer, Coughlin, Holman, Brown, Stotz, Pruitt, and Vasquez, who shall file an answer to the amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...