Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Celina Z. Porras, As An Individual, and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Stubhub

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


April 3, 2012

CELINA Z. PORRAS, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
STUBHUB, INC., AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge Northern District of California

David J. Lender (pro hac vice pending) Eric S. Hochstadt (pro hac vice pending) Kristen M. Echemendia (pro hac vice pending) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 4 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 5 david.lender@weil.com eric.hochstadt@weil.com 6 kristen.echemendia@weil.com 7 Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650) Liani Kotcher (Bar No. 277282) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway 9 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 10 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 chris.cox@weil.com 11 liani.kotcher@weil.com Attorneys for Defendant StubHub, Inc.

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ANY MOTION TO DISMISS, OPPOSITION, AND REPLY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a) and this stipulation, defendant StubHub, Inc. ("Defendant") hereby requests that the Court extend the deadline for Defendant to 3 file a response to plaintiff Celina Z. Porras' ("Plaintiff") Class Action Complaint from April 9, 4 2012 to April 30, 2012, with Plaintiff's opposition to any motion to dismiss due May 29, 2012 5 and Defendant's reply due June 11, 2012.

WHEREAS, on March 12, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Class Action Complaint; and

WHEREAS, on March 19, 2012, Defendant was served with a copy of the Class Action Complaint. 9

10 dismiss the Class Action Complaint be scheduled for April 30, 2012. Plaintiff stipulates to this 11 request. 12

13 motion to dismiss be scheduled for May 29, 2012. Defendant stipulates to this request. 14

15 to its motion to dismiss be scheduled for June 11, 2012. Plaintiff stipulates to this request. 16

17 concurs in the filing of this stipulated request. 18

DATED: March 30, 2012 20 21

1. Defendant requests that the deadline for it to file its answer or a motion to

2. Plaintiff requests that the deadline for her to file an opposition to any

3. Defendant requests that the deadline for it to file a reply to any opposition

Counsel for Defendant attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for Plaintiff

SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April ___, 2012

20120403

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.