UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 4, 2012
JAMES D. BENNETT, ET AL., PLAINTIFF,
YOUNG EUN LEE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO REMAND AND DENYING ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS [Dkt. No. 5]
Presently before the court is an Ex Parte Application for Order to Remand Unlawful Detainer Action to State Court with Request for Attorney Fees & Costs ("Application") filed by Plaintiffs James. D. Bennett and June M. Bennett. (Dkt. No. 5). Defendants Young Eun Lee and Will Guardado have not filed any opposition to the application.
As Plaintiffs explain, there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction in this action. (App. at 8.) Plaintiffs' unlawful detainer complaint raises only issues of state law, and the amount in controversy does not appear to exceed $75,000. Further, defenses based on federal law are insufficient to create federal jurisdiction. See HSBC Bank USA v. Santiago, No. CV 10-04127, 2011 WL 165382, at *1-2 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2011). The court therefore GRANTS Plaintiffs' Application to remand.
The court, however, denies Plaintiffs' request for fees and costs. As this court has explained under similar circumstances: "Defendants are proceeding without the assistance of counsel. While it is black letter law that defenses arising under federal law do not create removal jurisdiction, the court does not fault the Defendants for not having the same familiarity with the nuances of federal civil procedure that a lawyer should." Id. at *2.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.