UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
April 9, 2012
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD;
SEAMASTER LOGISTICS, INC.;
SUMMIT LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.; AND
AMERICAN GLOBAL LOGISTICS LLC, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Samuel Conti Judge
1 BERMAN FINK VAN HORN P.C. BENJAMIN I. FINK (Georgia Bar No. 261090) NEAL F. WEINRICH (Georgia Bar No. 294586) 3 Bfink@bfvlaw.com 4 email@example.com 3423 Piedmont Road, N.E., Suite 200 5 Atlanta Georgia 30305 6 Telephone: (404) 261-7711 Fax: (404) 233-1943 7 8 LAW OFFICES OF KIRK B. FREEMAN KIRK B. FREEMAN Bar No. 99685 9 MATTHEW A. MALLET Bar No. 203393 10 kirk@KBFLaw.com matthew@KBFLaw.com 11 214 Grant Avenue, Suite 301 San Francisco, California 94108 12 Telephone: (415) 398-1082 13 Fax: (415) 391-1285 14 Attorneys for Defendant 15 AMERICAN GLOBAL LOGISTICS, LLC 16
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANT AMERICAN
GLOBAL LOGISTICS, LLC TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT
OF ITS PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO RULE 12(B)(6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE;
Whereas, 1. On March 16, 2012, Defendant American Global Logistics, LLC ("AGL") 3 filed its Notice of Motion and Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second 4 Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil 5 Procedure [DKT 78] (the "Motion");
2. On March 30, 2012, Plaintiff Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd ("MOL") filed its Opposition to Defendants' Partial Motions to Dismiss of SeaMaster Logistics, 8 Inc.; Summit Logistics International, Inc.; and American Global Logistics, 9 LLC (the "Response") [DKT 80]; 10 3. AGL's Reply in Support of the Motion (the "Reply") is due on April 6, 2012; 11 4. AGL's counsel will be unavailable and out of the office on Friday, April 6, 12 2012, in observance of the Passover holiday;
5. In light of AGL's counsel's schedule, MOL's counsel has agreed that AGL 14 may have an extension through Tuesday, April 10, 2012, to file the Reply; 15 6. AGL's Motion is scheduled to be heard on May 4, 2012, thus a two-day 16 extension to allow AGL additional time in which to file the Reply will not 17 impact the current schedule;
7. There have been no previous time modifications with respect to the Motion; 19 8. In light of the foregoing, the parties agree that an extension of time for AGL to 20 file the Reply is appropriate;
21 The parties therefore stipulate and respectfully request that the Court order that AGL 22 shall have through and including Tuesday, April 10, 2012, to file the Reply.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
AMERICAN GLOBAL LOGISTICS, LLC
United States District Judge
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.