Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Title Charles Jeannel v. Independence Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 9, 2012

TITLE CHARLES JEANNEL
v.
INDEPENDENCE BANK

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Present: The Honorable Andrew J. Guilford

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Lisa Bredahl Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS]

ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION

Late in the afternoon of April 9, 2012, the Court received what purports to be an "Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal" ("Emergency Motion"). A title page was accompanied by a mass of other documents, filed in four separate docket entries, without explanation. (Dkt Nos. 6-9.) For many reasons, the filing provides inadequate support for the requested relief. See, e.g., Mission Power Eng'g Co. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488, 490 (C.D. Cal. 1995) (finding that "ex Parte motions are rarely justified"); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80-82 (1972) (due process requires that affected parties "are entitled to be heard" following "meaningful" notice, except in "extraordinary situations"); Sniadach v. Family Fin. Corp. of Bay View, 395 U.S. 337, 339-40 (1969) ("the right to be heard has little reality or worth unless one is informed that the matter is pending and can choose for himself whether to appear or default, acquiesce or contest").

The Emergency Motion is DENIED.

Initials of

Preparer lmb

20120409

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.