UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 13, 2012
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER; MCBRATNEY COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: R. Gary Klausner United States District Judge
[Assigned to the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, Room 850] [PROPOSED] ORDER IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND RETAIN COURT JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT [Stipulation filed concurrently herewith]
Complaint Filed: 11/29/10 AND RELATED CLAIMS. Trial Date: 2/28/12
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss this entire action with prejudice and for this Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement between the parties ("Stipulation"), which Stipulation was submitted by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America ("Safeco"), Counter-Defendant S&W Investments, Inc. dba Sage Contractor Services ("SCS"), and Defendant and Counterclaimant City of Los Angeles, acting by and through the Department of Water and Power ("LADWP"),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The court finds that good cause exists for granting the dismissal of the entire action with prejudice and for this Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement between the LADWP, SCS and Safeco as requested in the Stipulation, and therefore, the Stipulation is GRANTED;
2. This entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice; 3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement between the LADWP, SCS and Safeco.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IRVINE 174055.1 100191.085
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.