UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 16, 2012
MARY J. MCKENZIE,
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge
PETITION FOR FEES
This matter is before the Court on a petition for attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), filed on February 24, 2012, by Plaintiff Mary H. McKenzie ("Plaintiff"). Defendant did not file an opposition.
The matter is currently before the Court on the parties' briefs, which were submitted to the Honorable Dennis L. Beck, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff filed the instant Complaint challenging the denial of benefits on November 1, 2010.
On December 2, 2011, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations that the action be remanded for payment of benefits. The Findings and Recommendations were adopted on January 27, 2012, and judgment was entered in Plaintiff's favor.
By this motion, Plaintiff seeks a total of $7,045.33 for 36.95 hours of attorney time and 3.65 hours of paralegal time. Declaration of Harvey P. Sackett in Support of Application ("Sackett Dec."), ¶ 4.
Under the EAJA, a prevailing party will be awarded reasonable attorney fees, unless the government demonstrates that its position in the litigation was "substantially justified," or that "special circumstances make an award unjust." 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(A). An award of attorney fees must be reasonable. Sorenson v. Mink, 239 F.3d 1140, 1145 (9th Cir. 2001). "[E]xcessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary" hours should be excluded from a fee award, and charges that are not properly billable to a client are not properly billable to the government. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983). A court has wide latitude in determining the number of hours reasonably expended. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, 879 F.2d 481, 484 (9th Cir. 1988).
Here, Defendant has failed to file an opposition and has therefore failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that its position in the litigation was substantially justified, or that special circumstances make an award unjust.*fn1
Despite Defendant's failure to oppose the request, the Court must determine whether the requested fees are reasonable. According to his Declaration, Mr. Sackett spent a total of 36.95 hours in litigating this action, beginning with the review of the Appeals Council decision in September 2010 and culminating with the filing of this EAJA motion in February 2012. Sackett Dec., ¶ 4. These hours include time spent reviewing the Administrative Record, preparing the Confidential Settlement Letter, performing legal research, reviewing Defendant's filings and preparing this EAJA motion and accompanying declaration. Sackett Dec., ¶ 4. The Court finds this to be a reasonable amount of time.
Plaintiff also requests compensation for 3.65 hours of paralegal time. EAJA authorizes reimbursement for "work performed not only by attorneys but also by persons doing 'tasks traditionally performed by an attorney and for which the attorney would customarily charge the client,' regardless of whether a licensed attorney, paralegal or law clerk performed them." Priestly v. Astrue, 651 F.3d 410, 416 (4th Cir. 2011) (internal citations omitted). A review of the time reveals that Plaintiff's request for 3.65 hours of paralegal time, at a rate of $106.00 per hour, is reasonable. Sackett Dec., ¶ 4.
Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to an award in the total amount of $7,045.33 broken down as follows*fn2
2.6 hours at $175.06 per hour = $455.16
34.35 hours at $180.59 per hour = $6,203.27
3.65 hours at $106.00 per hour=$389.90
This amount is payable to Plaintiff pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). IT IS SO ORDERED.