Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Jeremy Thomas Boze

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 18, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JEREMY THOMAS BOZE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender LINDA C. HARTER, Bar #179741 Chief Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Defendant JEREMY THOMAS BOZE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL CONFIRMATION AND JURY TRIAL DATES;EXCLUDING TIME Date: April 27, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, HEIKO COPPOLA, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and LINDA C. HARTER, Chief Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for Defendant, that the Trial-Confirmation hearing date of April 27, 2012 and Jury Trial date of May 22, 2012 be vacated, and the matter rescheduled for Trial-Confirmation hearing on February 1, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. and Jury Trial on February 19, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

Additional time is requested for further investigation of the charges in the Superseding Indictment, and to accommodate the attorneys' schedules.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including February 1, 2013 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through February 1, 2013.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

20120418

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.