Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Evodio Moreno

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 19, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
EVODIO MORENO,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender MARC DAYS, Bar #184098 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Attorney for Defendant EVODIO MORENO

Date June 4, 2012 Time: 10:00 A.M.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference hearing in the above captioned matter now set for April 23, 2012, may be continued to June 4, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

This continuance is requested by counsel for the defendant because the parties need additional time for the government to provide the defense with a plea offer and, if necessary, for the parties to negotiate a resolution of the matter prior to the hearing. The continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court. Assistant United States Attorney Mark McKeon has no objection to this request.

The parties agree that time shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, including, but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation and continuing plea negotiation purposes.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested is granted for good cause. The Court finds that the interest of justice outweighs the interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial, and time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20120419

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.