Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rex Chappell v. T. Stankorb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 23, 2012

REX CHAPPELL,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
T. STANKORB, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COMPLETE ORDER AS MOOT Doc. 11

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 9, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for a complete order from the Court. Doc. 11. Plaintiff attached two Notices of Electronic Filing as examples. Id. The Court notes that on December 13, 2011, the Clerk of the Court sent Plaintiff various notices of electronic filing. The Court notes that there are no orders attached to these notices, and Plaintiff has received all of the orders from this Court.

Routine Orders. The Court may grant routine orders by a text-only entry upon the docket. In such cases, no PDF document will issue; the text-only entry shall constitute the Court's only order on the matter. The System will generate a "Notice of Electronic Filing" as described in these procedures for purposes of electronic service, and the Clerk will effect conventional service if required.

Local Rule 137(e).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED as moot.IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20120423

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.