The opinion of the court was delivered by: Terry J. Hatter, Jr., U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 3 5 8 8 (Last 4 digits)
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. April 23 2012
X WITH COUNSEL Brian A. Newman. Appointed
GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO NOT CONTENDERE GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Wire and Bank Fraud Conspiracy in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Section 1349, as charged in Count 1 of the Indictment. Bank Fraud in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Section 1344(1), as charged in Counts 15 & 16 o f the Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of: one day, which was already served, and now TIME SERVED.
The Court ORDERS the defendant to pay to the United States a special assessment of $300.00, to the Clerk of the Court. It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $200 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A.
The amount of restitution ordered shall be paid as follows:
Amount $200.00 If any amount of restitution remains unpaid after release from custody, monthly installments of at least $25 shall be made during the period of supervised release and shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision.
The defendant shall be held jointly and severally liable with co-participants Kenneth Joseph Lucas and Sylvia Johnson for the amount of restitution ordered in this judgment. The victim's recovery is limited to the amount of its loss and the defendant's liability for restitution ceases if and when the victim receives full restitution.
The defendant shall comply with the General Order No. 01-05.
All fines are waived as it is found that such sanction would place an undue burden on the defendant's dependents.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, ME ARLENE SETTLE, is, hereby, committed on Counts One, Fifteen and Sixteen of the Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned one day, which was already served, and now TIME SERVED.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years, all such terms to run concurrently under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Probation Office, General Order 05-02, and General Order 01-05, including the three special conditions delineated in General Order 01-05. . During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment. . The defendant shall participate for a period of six months in a home detention program which may include electronic monitoring, GPS, Alcohol Monitoring Unit or automated identification systems and shall observe all rules of such program, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall maintain a residential telephone line without devices and/or services that may interrupt operation of the monitoring equipment.
The defendant shall pay the costs of Location Monitoring to the contract vendor, not to exceed the sum of $12.00 for each day of participation. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer. . The defendant shall apply all monies received from income tax refunds, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation. . The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses no basis
Justification is pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) as stated today on the record.
The Court informs the defendant of her right to appeal. Bond is ...