Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gary Grossman v. City of Los Angeles.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 25, 2012

GARY GROSSMAN
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable George H. King, U. S. District Judge

E-Filed - JS-6

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Presiding: The Honorable GEORGE H. KING, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Beatrice Herrera N/A N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None None Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Remanding Case

On March 20, 2012, we dismissed Plaintiff Gary Grossman's ("Plaintiff") claims for Conversion and "Violation of Federal and State Constitutions" and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file a First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). We cautioned Plaintiff that his failure to timely file a FAC would be deemed his admission that amendment would be futile, and in that case, we would dismiss his conversion and constitutional claims with prejudice and remand this action to state court. The docket reflects that no FAC has been timely filed. Accordingly, we hereby ORDER that Plaintiff's conversion and constitutional claims are DISMISSED. In light of that dismissal, we decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Accordingly, we hereby REMAND this action to the state court from which it was removed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

-- : --

Initials of Deputy Clerk Bea

20120425

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.