Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nicholas Murray, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Time Inc.

April 27, 2012

NICHOLAS MURRAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
TIME INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michelle C. Doolin

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ☐ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process: √ Private ADR (please identify process and provider): private mediation before a mutually agreeable neutral selected from JAMS or The California Academy of Distinguished Neutrals.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.

√ other requested deadline: 180 days after entry of the order referring the case to an

ADR process. Defendant Time Inc. contends an order mandating ADR within 90 days could make the ADR process premature.

Dated: April 26, 2012 /s/ Ari J. Sharg Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: April 26, 2012 /s/ Michelle C. Doolin Attorney for Defendant ☐ The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. ☐ The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.