Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rolex Watch Usa Inc v. Ted Chan et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 27, 2012

ROLEX WATCH USA INC
v.
TED CHAN ET AL

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Present: The Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

R. Neal for Sharon L. Williams N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None appearing None appearing

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal re Lack of Prosecution

The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before May 16, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response.

If plaintiff(s) files

Proof(s) of TIMELY service of summons and complaint

Timely answer to complaint

Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Plaintiff's motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before the date indicated above, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order To Show Cause.

20120427

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.