IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 30, 2012
TERI ANN WINGO, PLAINTIFF,
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Carolyn K. Delaney United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. The motion was not properly noticed for hearing. In addition, the motion was not accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. The court cannot determine, therefore, whether leave to amend should be granted. The motion will therefore be denied without prejudice.
In the motion, plaintiff references a request to proceed in forma pauperis. This action was removed from state court. While the action was pending in state court, plaintiff was granted a fee waiver. Dkt. 1-1 at p. 52. Good cause appearing, plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (dkt. no. 14) is denied without prejudice.
2. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.