Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Veronica Pearson, Et v. Oaks Apartment

April 30, 2012

VERONICA PEARSON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
OAKS APARTMENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Carolyn K. Delaney United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

By order filed April 9, 2012, plaintiffs were directed to pay the filing fee and to file an amended complaint alleging a proper basis for subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs have filed a motion to reconsider that order. Plaintiffs fail to demonstrate what new or different facts exist which did not exist or were not shown in plaintiffs' application to proceed in forma pauperis. See Local Rule 230(j). In addition, the claims as presently pled are nothing more than state law claims and a basis for subject matter jurisdiction is not evident in plaintiffs' pleadings.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration (dkt. no. 7) is denied.

2. Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, plaintiffs shall submit the appropriate filing fee. Failure to pay the fee will result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed without prejudice to the claims being filed in state court.

3. Plaintiffs are reminded that an amended complaint alleging a proper basis for subject matter jurisdiction must be filed no later than May 9, 2012.

4 pearson.rec

20120430

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.