IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento)
May 1, 2012
THE PEOPLE, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,
JOSEPH JAQUEZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
(Super. Ct. No. 11F05940)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Nicholson , Acting P. J.
P. v. Jaquez CA2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
Defendant Joseph Jaquez was found possessing 18 grams of methamphetamine, five oxycodone pills, and a loaded 12-gauge shotgun.*fn1 Defendant pled no contest to possession of methamphetamine while armed with a loaded, operable firearm (Health & Saf. Code, § 11370.1, subd. (a)). The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on five years' formal probation subject to various conditions including a 365-day term in county jail.
Defendant appeals. He did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: HULL , J. MURRAY , J.