Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Daniel Delgado v. Debtor Juan Galindo Ali Sadik

May 1, 2012

DANIEL DELGADO,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DEBTOR JUAN GALINDO ALI SADIK, DBA BULTER MINI MART; JUAN GALINDO, DBA BULTER MINI MART, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AND EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT (Doc. 35)

I. INTRODUCTION

On January 17, 2012, the Court entered judgment against Defendant Juan Galindo. (Docs. 27, 28.) On March 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed a request for the issuance of an abstract of judgment, which was issued by the Court on April 2, 2012. (Docs. 29, 32.) On March 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application seeking a court order requiring the appearance and examination of judgment debtor Juan Galindo on May 9, 2012. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff's request for an order requiring the appearance and examination of judgment debtor was granted, and the order was issued on April 6, 2012, requiring Defendant Juan Galindo to personally appear before the Court on May 9, 2012. (Doc. 34.) On April 27, 2012, Plaintiff filed a "notice to reschedule the hearing" that was a renewed application for an order that the debtor examination take place on June 13, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7. (Doc. 35.)

II. DISCUSSION

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(1), "[t]he procedure on execution -- and in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution -- must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies."

In turn, California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.160 provides, in relevant part:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the proper court for examination of a person under this article is the court in which the money judgment is entered.

(b) A person sought to be examined may not be required to attend an examination before a court located outside the county in which the person resides or has a place of business unless the distance from the person's place of residence or place of business to the place of examination is less than 150 miles.

(c) If a person sought to be examined does not reside or have a place of business in the county where the judgment is entered, the superior court in the county where the person resides or has a place of business is a proper court for examination of the person.

Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §§ 708.160(a)-(c).

The Court construes Plaintiff's April 27, 2012, filing as a renewed application for an order for appearance and examination of a judgment debtor. The April 27, 2012, filing sets forth the showing required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(2) and the applicable provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.160. As set forth below, Defendant Juan Galindo shall appear personally before the Court on Wednesday, June 13, 2012.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant/judgment debtor Juan Galindo shall appear personally on Wednesday, June 13, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 of the United States District Courthouse, located at 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, to answer questions concerning ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.