Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Malik Jones v. A. David

May 1, 2012

MALIK JONES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
A. DAVID, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

On April 9, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion asking that this court reconsider the March 29, 2012, order adopting the magistrate judge's December 28, 2011, findings and recommendations thereby dismissing defendant Holmes from this action.

A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). "Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." Id. at 1263.

Plaintiff does not present newly discovered evidence suggesting this matter should not be dismissed as to Holmes. Furthermore, the Court finds that, after a de novo review of this case, the March 29, 2012, order adopting the magistrate judge's December 28, 2011, findings and recommendations is neither manifestly unjust nor clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's April 9, 2012, motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 65) is DENIED.

20120501

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.