Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


May 2, 2012

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge

Holly A. House (SB# 136045) Lee F. Berger (SB# 222756) Kevin C. McCann (SB# 120874) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 2 Sean D. Unger (SB# 231694) 875 15th Street, N.W. PAUL HASTINGS LLP Washington, DC 20005 3 55 Second Street Telephone: (202) 551-1772 Twenty-Fourth Floor Facsimile: (202) 551-0172 4 San Francisco, CA 94105 leeberger@paulhastings.com Telephone: (415) 856-7000 5 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 hollyhouse@paulhastings.com 6 kevinmccann@paulhastings.com seanunger@paulhastings.com 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. 9 10

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS 19

This Document Relates to Individual Case Nos: 18 State of Florida v. AU Optronics 20 Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-3517 Judge: Honorable Susan Y. Illston SI 21 State of Missouri, et al. v. AU Optronics 22 Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-03619 SI

Defendants LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. (together, "LG Display") 2 and the State Attorneys Generals ("AGs") in the above captioned actions stipulate as follows: 3

WHEREAS, LG Display moved for leave to amend its Answers and to assert Additional Defenses and the LG Display Counterclaims in State of Florida v. AU Optronics Corporation, et 5 al., Case No. 10-cv-3517 SI, and State of Missouri, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., 6 Case No. 10-cv-03619 SI, pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on 7 March 22, 2012 (hereafter, "LG Display's Motion to Amend");

WHEREAS the undersigned AGs that were served with LG Display's Motion to Amend 9 are required to file their Oppositions to that Motion on or before April 27, 2012, and LG Display 10 is required to file its Reply(ies) in support of its Motion on or before May 8, 2012; 11

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the 12 undersigned AGs and LG Display, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, as 13 follows: 14

The time for the undersigned AGs to respond to LG Display's Motion to Amend shall be 15 extended to May 14, 2012. 16 17

SO STIPULATED: 18

FILER'S ATTESTATION

The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the signatories thereto has been 19 obtained. 20 21

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Under the parties' stipulation set forth above, IT IS SO ORDERED.

By:

20120502

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.