The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Kronstadt, U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 3 2 0 0
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this 04 26 2012
X GUILTY, and the Court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
Introduction of an Unapproved New Drug into Interstate Commerce pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Section 331(d), 355(a), 333(a) as charged in Count 4 of the Indictment
The Court and counsel confer. Counsel present argument. Defendant addresses the Court. The Court places findings on the record and proceeds with sentencing. The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Charles B. Hensley, is hereby placed on PROBATION on Count 4 of the Indictment for a term of THREE (3) YEARS under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall perform 400 hours of community service, as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall provide the Probation Officer with access to any and all business records, client lists and other records pertaining to the operation of any business owned, in whole or in part, by the defendant, as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall not be employed in any position that requires licensing and/or certification by any local, state or federal agency without prior approval of the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall apply all monies received from income tax refunds, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation;
The defendant shall submit to a search, at any time, with or without warrant, and by any law enforcement or probation officer, of the defendant's person and any property, house, residence, vehicle, papers, computer, other electronic communication or data storage devices or media, and effects upon reasonable suspicion concerning a violation of a condition of supervision or unlawful conduct by the defendant, or by any probation officer in the lawful discharge of the officer's supervision functions; and
The defendant shall not engage, as whole or partial owner (except as owner of a non-controlling share of publicly traded stock), consultant, volunteer, employee or otherwise, in any business involved in the marketing, development, purchasing for resale, or distribution of medications for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. This Order does not prohibit Defendant from marketing, developing, or distributing homeopathic medications; provided, however, that their sale and distribution must have been expressly approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration or pursuant to its regulatory procedures.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $25, which is due immediately.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $5,000, which shall bear interest as provided by law. The fine shall be paid in full no ...