Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

George H. Robinson v. D. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 3, 2012

GEORGE H. ROBINSON,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
D. ADAMS, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Barbara A. McAuliffe United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS (ECF Nos. 132, 135) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

On March 16, 2012, an order issued granting Defendants' motion for a protective order and ordering Defendants to serve responsive documents within thirty days. (ECF No. 130.) On April 4, 2012, and May 2, 2012, Plaintiff filed motions for sanctions stating that Defendants have not complied with the order and no discovery has been served. Defendants failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion filed April 4, 2012. Local Rule 230(l).

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff's motions for sanctions within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order; and

2. The failure to respond to Plaintiff's motions in compliance with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120503

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.