IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2012
STEVEN A. MARTIN, PLAINTIFF,
A. MASURET, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
On April 23, 2012, plaintiff filed a document styled as objections to the magistrate judge's April 4, 2012 order denying his motion, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d), to postpone consideration of defendants' pending motion for summary judgment.*fn1 The court construes plaintiff's objections as a request for reconsideration of that order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed April 4, 2012, is affirmed.