Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Berry Lynn Adams v. Daniel L. Kraft

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


May 4, 2012

BERRY LYNN ADAMS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DANIEL L. KRAFT, A STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARK RANGER, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

United States District Court District of California

ORDER EXCLUDING TESTIMONY OF PERCIPIENT WITNESSES TO THE JUNE 22, 2009 INCIDENT

Upon further reflection, any testimony of percipient witnesses to the June 22, 2009 incident 16 is irrelevant and inadmissible unless Plaintiff can establish that Defendants Kraft and Hauck were 17 aware of such information at the time they arrested Plaintiff Adams. Plaintiff has not established 18 that Defendants Kraft and Hauck were aware of such information in her pleadings or at the pretrial 19 conference. Should Plaintiff wish to make such a proffer, she must do so in writing by Monday, 20 May 7, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120504

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.