Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Carrie Hawecker, et al v. Rawland Leon Sorenson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 7, 2012

CARRIE HAWECKER, ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
RAWLAND LEON SORENSON, DEFENDANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
RAWLAND LEON SORENSON,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS HAWECKER'S AND BROUSSARD'S REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO HEAR MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AND MOTION TO COMPEL (Doc. 133, 134)

On May 4, 2012, the individual Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the scheduling order to allow 14 additional days to file a motion to compel Defendant to provide the records and responses to discovery. (Doc. 133) This discovery was the subject of an earlier motion to compel, which was granted in part on April 16, 2012. (Doc. 107) Plaintiffs report that Defendant has failed to comply with the Court's order. (Doc. 133)

Notably, in the original scheduling order, the Court ordered that non-dispositive motions, 2 including discovery motions, were to be filed no later than March 16, 2012. (Doc. 95 at 7) Though the 3 scheduling order was amended twice (Docs. 100, 114), the Court was never asked to amend the order 4 as it related to the filing of non-dispositive motions and the date for doing so has never been extended. 5

In any event, good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:

1. Plaintiffs' request for an order shortening time is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiffs' are relieved of their obligation to participate in a pre-filing conference with 8 the Court before filing their motion to amend the scheduling order and their discovery motion;

3. Plaintiffs SHALL file their motion to amend the scheduling order*fn1 concurrently with their discovery motion no later than May 11, 2012*fn2 . Plaintiff SHALL serve the motion(s) to Defendant via overnight mail, so that it is delivered no later than May 11, 2012;

4. Opposition to the motion(s), SHALL be filed no later than May 21, 2012;

5. No reply SHALL be filed;

6. The motions SHALL be heard on May 25, 2012 at 8:30 a.m., at the United States Bankruptcy Courtroom located at 1300 18th Street, Bakersfield, California. Counsel are encouraged to appear by telephone. Should they choose to do so, they SHALL notify the Court of this intention via an e-mail to JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov, no later than May 18, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.