Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Anthony Encarnacao v. Phase Forward Incorporated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 9, 2012

ANTHONY ENCARNACAO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PHASE FORWARD INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; CHRISTOPHER MENARD, AN INDIVIDUAL; D. ARI BUCHLER, AN INDIVIDUAL; RUSSELL J. CAMPANELLO, AN INDIVIDUAL; STEVEN ROSENBERG, AN INDIVIDUAL; STEVEN POWELL, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND ROBERT K. WEILER, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Otis D. Wright, II United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [46] AND VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [62]

Defendant Phase Forward's February 21, 2012 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is hereby DENIED. The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) no later than Friday May 18, 2012, and to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report no later than Friday May 25, 2012. The Joint Report shall devote particular attention and detail to the proposed discovery plan and anticipated dispositive motions. The August 27, 2012 Scheduling Conference is hereby VACATED; the Court will issue a Scheduling and Case Management Order on the basis of the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120509

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.