UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 16, 2012
JANICE EVANS, PLAINTIFF,
HUONG T. LEE DBA PETE'S STOP AKA PETE'S STOP & MINI MART, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edward M. Chen Judge United States District Court Judge
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Janice Evans ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete's Stop aka Pete's Stop & Mini Mart ("Defendant"), by and 20 through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), 21 Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete's Stop aka Pete's Stop & Mini Mart be dismissed with 22 prejudice from this action. 23
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendant that this case has been 24 settled as between them and all issues and controversies have been resolved to their mutual 25 satisfaction. Plaintiff and Defendant request the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms 26 of their settlement agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of 27 America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994). 28 Evans v. Lee, et al.
Date: May 15, 2012 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 2 3
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Janice Evans
Date: May 15, 2012 /s/ Mimi N. Trieu
Mimi N. Trieu
Attorney for Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete's
Stop aka Pete's Stop & Mini Mart
The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff Janice Evans and Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete's Stop aka Pete's Stop & Mini Mart shall comply with the terms of the confidential Settlement Agreement and 17 Release in Full, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference. 18
2. By consent of Plaintiff Janice Evans and Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete's Stop 19 aka Pete's Stop & Mini Mart, the Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for the purpose of 20 enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement. 21 3. Except as provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, Huong T. Le dba Pete's Stop 22 aka Pete's Stop & Mini Mart is dismissed with prejudice from this action. 23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.