Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Ahmed Chartaev

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 16, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
AHMED CHARTAEV, KHADZHIMURAD BABATOV, NICHOLAS VOTAW, STANISLAV SARBER, HAKOB SERGOYAN, ROMAN MALAKHOV, MAGOMED ABDUKHALIKOV, SERGEY SHCHIRSKIY, AND ANDREY KIM, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

THOMAS A. JOHNSON, #119203 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1620 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 422-4022 Attorney for Defendant Andrey Kim

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG ALL PARTIES that the Status Conference scheduled for May 18, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. is continued to July 13, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in the same courtroom. R. Steven Lapham, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas A. Johnson, attorney for Andrey Kim, Kresta Daly, attorney for Ahmed Chartaev, John Duree, attorney for Khadzhimurad Babatov, Chris Cosca, attorney for Roman Malakhov, Danny Brace, attorney for Sergey Shschirskiy, Preeti Bajwa, attorney for Magomed Abdukhalikov, David Fischer, attorney for Nicholas Votaw, Alan Eisner, attorney for Hakob Sergoyan, and Peter Kmeto, attorney for Stanislav Sarber, are requesting such continuance in order to continue review of discovery and for preparation of counsel. All parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice are served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Defendants in a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

It is further stipulated that the period from the date of this stipulation through and including July 13, 2012, be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii), 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (reasonable time for preparation of counsel). The ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest in the public and the Defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120516

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.