Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Park Village Apartments Tenants Association v. Mortimer Howard Trust

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 17, 2012

PARK VILLAGE APARTMENTS TENANTS ASSOCIATION,
WILLIAM FOSTER, SHIRLEY SMITH, ANAHID
ISSAHAKIAN, PATRICIA JOHNSON,
MARTIN KOCH, LAWRENCE LEE, FOSTER REUBEN, MARIA LILLIAN SANCHEZ, ALISON WRIGHT AND CORNELIUS WEEKLEY,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MORTIMER HOWARD TRUST, MORTIMER R. HOWARD,
DEFENDANTS.

BAY AREA LEGAL AID LISA GREIF, State Bar No. 214537 2 NAOMI YOUNG, State Bar No. 105041 3 ROBERT P. CAPISTRANO, State Bar No. 70382 1735 Telegraph Avenue 4 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: 510-663-4744 5 Facsimile: 510-663-4740 6 Email: lgreif@baylegal.org nyoung@baylegal.org 7 bcapistrano@baylegal.org NATIONAL HOUSING LAW PROJECT 9 8 JAMES R. GROW, State Bar No. 83548 KENT QIAN, State Bar No. 264944 10 703 Market St. Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94103 11 Telephone: 415-546-7000 12 Facsimile: 415-546-7007 Email: jgrow@nhlp.org 13 kqian@nhlp.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs PARK VILLAGE APARTMENTS TENANTS 14 ASSOCIATION, FOSTER, et al. 15

E-FILED

JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Joint Request to Continue Settlement Conference and [Proposed] Order Plaintiffs, PARK VILLAGE APARTMENT TENANTS ASSOCIATION, et al. (Plaintiffs) 2 and Defendants, MORTIMER HOWARD TRUST and MORTIMER HOWARD (Defendants), in 3 the above-entitled action, by and through respective counsel, hereby request that the settlement 4 conference with Magistrate Judge Beeler, be continued to June 22, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. 5

The reasons for this continuance request include:

1. The parties are currently engaged in settlement discussions and significant progress has been made toward a final stipulated agreement to make the preliminary injunction upheld by the Ninth Circuit on February 24, 2011 permanent.

2. This agreement will be a resolution of all issues and will include a dismissal of the case.

3. The parties agree that only a few negotiation points remain and feel it would be more 13 productive at this time to continue settlement negotiations between themselves with the goal of a 14 final resolution. 15

Additionally, Defendants also request that the deadline for filing the answer also be 16 extended to June 21, 2012, the day before the reset settlement conference date.

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document.

Dated: 5/16/2012

By: /s/ Lisa S. Greif LISA S. GREIF Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

The Court having read and considered the Parties' request to continue the settlement 4 conference and good cause appearing, 5

IT IS ORDERED that the request is granted. 6

The settlement conference will be reschedule to ___________________________ and 7 Defendants' answer will be due on ____________________________. 8 9 10

DATED:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20120517

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.