Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Derek Todd v. Officer Donald Bevins; Officer Brad Dewall; Solano County Sheriff's

June 1, 2012

DEREK TODD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
OFFICER DONALD BEVINS; OFFICER BRAD DEWALL; SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis. Presently before the court for screening, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), is plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 8), which alleges claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 premised on alleged violations of plaintiff's rights to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.*fn1

The undersigned cannot conclude on the present record that plaintiff's action is frivolous, that the First Amended Complaint fails to state claims on which relief can be granted, or that plaintiff seeks monetary relief from an immune defendant. The undersigned reserves decision as to plaintiff's claims until the record is sufficiently developed, and this order in no way precludes defendants from challenging plaintiff's First Amended Complaint through a timely motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 or other appropriate method of challenging plaintiff's pleading. Therefore, the undersigned orders service of the First Amended Complaint on the following defendants: Officer Donald Bevins, Officer Brad Dewall, and the Solano County Sheriff's Department.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Service of plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is appropriate for the following three defendants: Officer Donald Bevins, Officer Brad Dewall, and the Solano County Sheriff's Department.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.

3. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff three USM-285 form, one summons, this court's scheduling order, and the forms providing notice of the magistrate judge's availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes.

4. Plaintiff is advised that to effectuate service, the U.S. Marshal will require:

a. One completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant to be served;

c. A copy of the First Amended Complaint for each defendant to be served, with an extra copy for the U.S. Marshal;

d. A copy of this court's scheduling order and related documents for each defendant to be served; and

e. A copy of this order for each defendant to be served.

5. Plaintiff shall supply the United States Marshal, within 30 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effectuate service of process, and shall, within 10 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal.

6. The U.S. Marshal shall serve process, along with copies of this order and this court's scheduling order and related documents, within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiff, without prepayment of costs. The United States Marshal shall, within 10 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that such documents have been served. If the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason, to effect service of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.