Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gladger Ross v. Angel Ortiz et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 3, 2012

GLADGER ROSS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANGEL ORTIZ ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: S. James Oterounited States District Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all the records and files of this case, and the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge with respect to a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Report and Recommendation, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Defendants Ortiz and Brown and GRANTED as to Defendant Malingkas. Defendant Arce is DISMISSED from this lawsuit because, as stated in the Magistrate Judge's January 30, 2012 Order, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim against her. Defendants Ortiz and Brown are ORDERED to file an Answer to the FAC within 20 days of the issuance of this Order.

20120603

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.