Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jason Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 4, 2012

JASON EDWARDS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN OPENING BRIEF (Doc. 12)

Counsel for Plaintiff Jason Edwards seeks an extension of time to file an opening brief in this action against the Commissioner of Social Security for judicial review of the administrative decision denying Social Security benefits. (Doc. 12).

Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Plaintiff had thirty days after the filing of the Administrative Records to serve a confidential letter brief on Defendant. (Doc. 7 at 2). Because the Administrative Record was filed on February 16, 2012 (Doc. 11), Plaintiff's confidential letter brief was to be served no later than March 19, 2012. Within thirty-five days of service of the confidential letter brief, or by April 23, 2012, Defendant was required to serve a response. (See Doc. 7 at 2). When parties do not agree to a remand, an opening brief must be filed with the Court within thirty days of service of the defendant's response. Id. Therefore, Plaintiff's opening brief was due by May 23, 2012.

In the Scheduling Order, the parties were notified any requests to modify the Scheduling Order must be made by written motion and would only be granted for good cause. (Doc. 7 at 4). Further, the parties were warned that violations of the order may result in sanctions pursuant to Local Rule 110. 2

Id. Nevertheless, Plaintiff did not seek modification of the briefing schedule until after the deadline 3 for filing his opening brief expired.

Plaintiff's counsel, Ms. Bosavanh reports there were problems with the computer system in her 5 office for several months, and as a result, Ms. Bosavanh did not receive the defendant's response to 6 the confidential letter brief on the date it was served. (Doc. 12 at 2). According to Ms. Bosavanh, she 7 received the response on May 29, 2012. Id. Thus, Plaintiff seeks an extension of twenty days, until June 12, 2012, to submit an opening brief.

Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff SHALL file an opening brief on or before June 12, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120604

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.