Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Emilio Cruz

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 4, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
EMILIO CRUZ,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney PHILIP A. FERRARI JEAN M. HOBLER Assistant U.S. Attorneys 501 "I" Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2744

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE

Date: July 12, 2012

Time: 9:00 a.m.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America and defendant Emilio Cruz that the status conference in the above-captioned matter set for May 31, 2012, be continued to July 12, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

The parties further stipulate that the time period from the date of the originally set status conference, May 31, 2012, through the date of the status conference set for July 12, 2012, should be excluded from computation of the time for commencement of trial under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, because of the volume discovery in this case and the need for counsel to have reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

For these reasons, the defendant, defense counsel, and the government stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (Local Code T4).

ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the status conference currently set for May 31, 2012, is VACATED, and continued to July 12, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. For the reasons stipulated to by the parties, good cause exists pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7), and time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act through July 12, 2012. For the reasons set forth in the stipulation, the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (Local Code T4).

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20120604

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.