Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Mher Darbinyan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 6, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MHER DARBINYAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

O

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS [Docket Nos. 1712, 1715, 1752, 1768, 1772, 1780]

Presently before the court is Defendant's Motion for Production of Grand Jury Transcripts ("Motion"). Having reviewed the parties' moving papers and heard oral argument, the court denies the Motion and adopts the following Order.

The court finds that Defendant has not adequately shown "'a particularized need' for the grand jury materials requested." United States v. Bennett, 702 F.2d 833, 836 (1983) (quoting Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States, 360 U.S. 395, 400 (1959)). The court therefore DENIES the Motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120606

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.