Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Alvino Salmeron

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 7, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ALVINO SALMERON, IVAN LEYVA DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

THOMAS A. JOHNSON, #119203 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1620 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 422-4022 Attorney for Defendant ALVINO SALMERON

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE Date: July 30, 2012 Time: 9:30 a.m. Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG ALL PARTIES that the Status Conference scheduled for June 11, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. is continued to July 30, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. in the same courtroom. Daniel S. McConkie, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas A. Johnson, attorney for Alvino Salmeron, and Jeffrey L. Staniels, attorney for Ivan Leyva, are requesting the additional time in order to discuss issues relating to the possible resolution, discovery, and other matters in the case. All parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice are served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Defendants in a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7(A).

It is further stipulated that the period from the date of this stipulation through and including July 30, 2012, be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii), 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local T4 (reasonable time for preparation of counsel).

The ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest in the public and the Defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the June 11, 2012, Status Conference be continued to July 30, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. The court finds that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time and that the defendants' need for continuity and reasonable time for preparation exceeds the public interest in a speedy trial. THEREFORE, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii), 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local T4 (reasonable time for preparation of counsel).

20120607

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.