Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Scott N. Johnson v. Richard H. Ruff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 8, 2012

SCOTT N. JOHNSON PLAINTIFF,
v.
RICHARD H. RUFF,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL JUNE 29, 2012 FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson and Defendant, Richard H. Ruff, stipulate as follows:

1. No extension of time has been previously obtained.

2. Defendant is granted an extension until June 29, 2012 to respond or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint.

3. Defendant's response will be due no later than June 29, 2012.

IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of June 7, 2012.

Dated: June 7, 2012 _/s/ Cris C. Vaughan__ Cris C. Vaughan, Attorney for Defendant, Carapanos Properties, LLC Dated: June 7, 2012 _/s/ Scott N. Johnson________ Scott N. Johnson, Attorney for Plaintiff

20120608

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.