Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pixion, Inc., A Delaware Corporation v. Citrix Systems

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


June 11, 2012

PIXION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
PLAINTIFF/COUNTER- DEFENDANTS,
v.
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., A DELAWARE CONFERENCE CORPORATION, CITRIX ONLINE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DEFENDANTS/COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Judge Susan Illston United States District Court Judge

COLBY B. SPRINGER (SBN: 214868) TERRY W. AHEARN (SBN: 216543) cspringer@lrlaw.com tahearn@mwe.com LEWIS AND ROCA LLP BRYAN K. JAMES (SBN: 260753) 2440 West El Camino Real, 6th floor bjames@mwe.com McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP Mountain View, CA 94040 275 Middlefield Rd., Suite 100 Tel: 650.391.1394 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Fax: 650.391.1395 Telephone: 650.815.7400 Facsimile: 650.815.7401 NATHANIEL W. EDWARDS (Pro Hac Vice) nedwards@lrlaw.com SARAH COLUMBIA (Pro Hac Vice) SHANE E. OLAFSON (Pro Hac Vice) scolumbia@mwe.com solafson@lrlaw.com LEIGH MARTINSON (Pro Hac Vice) lmartinson@mwe.com LEWIS & ROCA LLP McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 40 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1900 28 State Street, 34th floor Phoenix, AZ 85004 Boston, MA 02109-1775 Tel: 602.262.5367 Telephone: 617.535.4000 Fax: 602.748.2530 Facsimile: 617.535.3800 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants and Counter- Plaintiffs CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and CITRIX ONLINE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR PRETRIAL AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties jointly request that the time for Pretrial Conference 2 ordered by the December 21, 2011 Pretrial Preparation Order, Dkt. No. 96, be changed from 3 August 21, 2012, to September 11, 2012, or as sooner or later as the Court is available . 4 The Pretrial Preparation Order set a Pretrial Schedule. Dkt. No. 96. On January 19, 2012, 5 the Court amended the Pretrial Schedule. Dkt. No. 101. Pursuant to the current Pretrial 6 Schedule, the pretrial conference is set to take place on August 21, 2012. The Court's Pretrial 7 Instructions require the parties to submit a joint Pretrial Statement fourteen days prior to the 8 Pretrial Conference on August 7, 2012. The parties request additional time to prepare the joint 9 Pretrial Statement and participate in the Pretrial Conference. 10 Briefing on dispositive motions ends June 29, 2012. The hearing on the parties' LLP 11 dispositive motions is July 13, 2012.

The current schedule would require the parties to essentially be ready for trial three weeks after the July 13th hearing and more than seven weeks before the scheduled start of trial on October 1, 2012.

The parties believe they need more time to accomplish the joint tasks outlined by the Court's Pretrial Instructions.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, and subject to the approval of this Court, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the Court change the date for 17 participating in the Pretrial Conference from August 21, 2012, to September 11, 2012 or the next 18 best date available to the Court.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, Terry W. Ahearn, attest 3 that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 4

Dated: June 8, 2012

/s/ Terry W. Ahearn

Terry W. Ahearn

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Upon stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120611

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.