Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Juan Gabriel Alvarez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 13, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
JUAN GABRIEL ALVAREZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

THOMAS A. JOHNSON, #119203 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1620 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 422-4022 Attorney for Defendant Juan Alvarez

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG ALL PARTIES that the Status Conference scheduled for June 15, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. is continued to August 10, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. in the same courtroom. Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, and Thomas A. Johnson, attorney for Juan Alvarez, are requesting a continuance in order to continue review of discovery and for preparation of counsel. Mr. Johnson recently substituted into the case and needs additional time to prepare. All parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice are served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Defendants in a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7(A).

It is further stipulated that the period from the date of this stipulation through and including August 10, 2012, be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii), 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local T4 (reasonable time for preparation of counsel).

The ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest in the public and the Defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the June 15, 2012, Status Conference be continued to August 10, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. The court finds that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time and that the defendants' need for continuity and reasonable time for preparation exceeds the public interest in a speedy trial. THEREFORE, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii), 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local T4 (reasonable time for preparation of counsel).

20120613

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.