Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Donald Wanland

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 14, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DONALD WANLAND
DEFENDANT.

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

On May 15, 2012, the Court found that the time between May 15, 2012 and June 19, 2012 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

The ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that new counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Counsel for the Defendant requires time to review discovery and evaluate what motions he will seek to file. The interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

SO ORDERED.

20120614

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.