IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 19, 2012
MICHAEL R. JONES,
FOREST SERVICE; THOMAS J. VILSACK, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, requests reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's May 23, 2012 Order, which denied Plaintiff's request for recusal and request for appointment of counsel.
Pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 303(f) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), a Magistrate Judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law[.]" Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that Plaintiff has not shown the Magistrate Judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore,
Plaintiff's request for reconsideration is DENIED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.