Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Eric Shippam, et al v. Rapid Link Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 19, 2012

ERIC SHIPPAM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
RAPID LINK CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

On May 21, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (Dkt. No. 22.) No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (dkt. no. 22) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The clerk's entry of default as to defendant Telenational Communications, Inc. (dkt. no. 8) is SET ASIDE; and

3. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendant Telenational Communications, Inc. (dkt. no. 20) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as service has not been effectuated and the motion is premature.

20120619

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.