Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Alex Soto and Vince Eagen, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. American Honda Motor Co.

June 21, 2012

ALEX SOTO AND VINCE EAGEN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Susan Illston

Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181 Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com 2 TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC 936 North 34th Street, Suite 400 3 Seattle, Washington 98103-8869 Telephone: (206) 816-6603 4 Facsimile: (206) 350-3528 5 Steven N. Berk 6 Email: steven@berklawdc.com Matthew J. Bonness, CSB #229226 7 Email: matt@berklawdc.com BERK LAW PLLC 8 2002 Massachusetts Avenue, Northwest, Suite 100 9 Washington, District of Columbia 20036 Telephone: (202) 232-7550 10 Facsimile: (202) 232-7556 11 [Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] 12 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen 13 14

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

CLASS ACTION Complaint Filed: March 19, 2012

This stipulation is entered into by Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen ("Plaintiffs") 25 and Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. ("AHM" or "Defendant") (collectively, the 26 27 "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, with reference to the following facts and 2 recitals: 3 2012 (Dkt. #1); and to a proposed filing and briefing schedule regarding Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint 7 and Defendant's response to the First Amended Complaint, which the Court approved by order 8 dated May 22, 2012 (Dkt. #12); 9

Amended Complaint on May 18, 2012 (Dkt. #11) and on June 8, 2012, Defendant filed an 11

Arbitration and Stay Proceedings as to Plaintiff Vince Eagen (Dkt. #16) ("Arbitration 13

D. When agreeing to the earlier stipulated filing and briefing schedule on

Defendant's response to the First Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs were unaware that Defendant 16 would file the Arbitration Motion;

E. Plaintiffs have reviewed the Arbitration Motion and determined that limited

18 arbitration-related discovery is necessary to properly and completely respond to the Arbitration 19

F. Accordingly, counsel for the Parties have met and conferred with respect to extending the briefing schedule and hearing date on the Arbitration Motion to permit Plaintiffs 22 to take limited arbitration-related discovery, and subject to the Court's approval, agree to the 23 following: 24 25 26 27

A. Plaintiffs filed their Class Action Complaint in the subject action on March 19,

B. The parties subsequently stipulated to Plaintiffs filing an ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.