Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Ralph Michael Smith

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 21, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
RALPH MICHAEL SMITH,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429 Assistant Federal Defender 2300 Tulare St., Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Counsel for Defendant RALPH MICHAEL SMITH

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER

Date: July 9, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, BRIAN ENOS, Assistant United States Attorney, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant, Ralph Michael Smith, that the date for status conference may be continued to July 9, 2012, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is June 25, 2012. The requested new date is July 9, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

Mr. Smith has signed a plea agreement in this matter and he will formally enter the agreement and be remanded into custody at the upcoming status conference. This brief continuance is requested to allow time for Mr. Smith to complete the process of putting his affairs in order before serving a substantial prison sentence.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for defense preparation and continuity of counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20120621

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.