Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Haiying Fan

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 22, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
HAIYING FAN,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney PHILIP A. FERRARI MICHELE BECKWITH Assistant United States Attorneys 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2744

STIPULATION CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE; and [proposed] ORDER Date: August 3, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m.

It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America through its attorney, and defendant Haiying Fan, through her attorney, that the status conference hearing set for June 22, 2012, be vacated, and a status conference hearing be set for August 3, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. In addition to the voluminous discovery originally produced in this case, the parties have received and are examining additional materials from the State Department of Real Estate which relate to the underlying facts in this case. As stated previously, the parties believe that analysis of these materials may aid in achieving resolution of this case, and is necessary to prepare the case for trial in any event. Thus, the parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding the time between June 22, 2012, and August 3, 2012. The parties request that time be excluded based upon counsel's need for reasonable time to prepare, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (local Code T4).

PHILIP A. FERRARI

Assistant U.S. Attorney IT IS ORDERED that the status conference currently set for June 22, 2012, is vacated, and a new status conference is set for August 3, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. For the reasons stipulated to by the parties, good cause exists pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h), and time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act through August 3, 2012, pursuant to local code T4. For the reasons set forth in the stipulation, the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

20120622

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.