UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 26, 2012
SUSAN B. LENNARD
PETER YEUNG, ET AL
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Margaret M. Morrow
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Present: The Honorable MARGARET M. MORROW
ANEL HUERTA N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None appearing None appearing
Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order to Show Cause re Dismissal re Lack of Prosecution
Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the complaint is filed.
Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 20 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 12(a)(1).
In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before July 2012 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response.
If plaintiff/defendant files
Plaintiff's motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:
Longrow Holding, Inc. a Missouri Corporation, Huntleigh Capital Management, Inc. a Missouri Corporation and Huntleigh Financial Services, Inc. a Missouri Corporation on or before the date indicated above, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order To Show Cause.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.